toggle visibility Search & Display Options

Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 
  Record Links
Author (up) Fossa, S.D.; Dahl, A.A.; Langhammer, A.; Weedon-Fekjaer, H. url  doi
  Title Cancer patients' participation in population-based health surveys: findings from the HUNT studies Type Journal Article
  Year 2015 Publication BMC Res Notes Abbreviated Journal BMC research notes  
  Volume 8 Issue Pages 649  
  Keywords HUNT1; HUNT2; HUNT3; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Health Surveys/*methods/*statistics & numerical data; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms/*diagnosis/epidemiology; Norway/epidemiology; Patient Participation/*statistics & numerical data; Registries/statistics & numerical data; Sex Factors; Young Adult  
  Abstract BACKGROUND: The magnitude of participation bias due to non-participation should be considered for cancer patients invited to population-based surveys. We studied participation rates among persons with and without cancer in a large population based study, the Nord-Trondelag Health Study (HUNT). METHODS: Citizens 20 years or above living in the Nord-Trondelag County of Norway have been invited three times to comprehensive health surveys. The invitation files with data on sex, invitation date and participation were linked to the Cancer Registry of Norway. In a first step unadjusted crude participation rates (participants/invited persons) were estimated for cancer patients (CaPts) and non-cancer persons (NonCaPers), followed by logistic regression analyses with adjustment for age and sex. To evaluate the “practical” significance of the estimated odds ratios in the cancer diagnosis group, relative risks were also estimated comparing the observed rates to the estimated rates under the counterfactual assumption of no earlier cancer diagnosis among CaPts. RESULTS: Overall 3 % of the participants in the three HUNT studies were CaPts and 59 % of them had been diagnosed with their first life-time cancer >5 years prior to each survey. In each of the three HUNT surveys crude participation rates were similar for CaPts and NonCaPers. Adjusted for sex and age, CaPts' likelihood to participate in HUNT1 (1984-86) and HUNT2 (1995-97), but not in HUNT3 (2006-2008), was statistically significantly reduced compared to NonCaPers, equaling a relative risk of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. The lowest odds ratio emerged for CaPts diagnosed during the last 2 years preceding a HUNT invitation. Only one-third of CaPts participating in a survey also participated in the subsequent survey compared to approximately two-thirds of NonCaPers, and 11 % of CaPts participated in all three HUNT surveys compared to 37 % of NonCaPers. CONCLUSION: In the three HUNT surveys no or only minor participation bias exist as to CaPts' participation rates. In longitudinal studies selection bias as to long-term cancer survivorship should be taken into account, the percentage of repeatedly participating CaPts diminishing more strongly than among NonCaPers.  
  Corporate Author Thesis  
  Publisher Place of Publication National Advisory Unit for Late Effects after Cancer Therapy, Oslo University Hospital, Radium Hospi Editor  
  Language Summary Language Original Title  
  Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title  
  Series Volume Series Issue Edition  
  ISSN ISBN Medium  
  Area Expedition Conference  
  Notes Fossa, Sophie DDahl, Alv ALanghammer, ArnulfWeedon-Fekjaer, HaraldengEngland2015/11/07 06:00BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 5;8:649. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1635-5. Approved no  
  Call Number HUNT @ maria.stuifbergen @ Fossa2015 Serial 1809  
Permanent link to this record
Select All    Deselect All
 |   | 

Save Citations:
Export Records: